[Editor’s Pick] Supply Chain Trends 2026: From Disruption To Adaptation
Excerpt of Infios blog post that highlights seven shifts defining how supply chains evolve toward modularity, resilience, and intelligence.
Note: Today’s post is part of our “Editor’s Pick” series where we highlight posts published by our sponsors that provide practical knowledge and advice on timely and important supply chain and logistics topics. This recent Infios blog post highlights seven shifts defining how supply chains evolve toward modularity, resilience and intelligence.
What’s Ahead for Supply Chains in 2026
Supply chains aren’t just facing disruption — they’re living in it. The old playbook of squeezing out efficiency is giving way to something smarter: systems that can adapt quickly and keep pace with constant change. If supply chains want to stay competitive, leaders need to think beyond cost-cutting and start designing for flexibility and speed.
Strategic Shifts for 2026:
Resilience is about adaptability, not backups. Static contingency plans won’t cut it — networks need to reconfigure on the fly.
AI is finally practical. It’s not about replacing people; it’s about giving teams better insights and faster decisions.
Connected execution is non-negotiable. Order management, warehouse management, and transportation management need to work in sync for real-time visibility.
Tech with purpose wins. Chasing platforms for their own sake is out; solving real problems is in.
Leaders can prepare for these shifts by building a culture that embraces change and exploring uses of AI throughout technology stacks as a strategic advantage. The winners in 2026 will be those who can pivot fast and keep their supply chains resilient by design — not by reaction.
Charter Sponsors
Trust and Trading Partner Compliance
As a follow-up to previous surveys on trust in supply chain management, this survey explores trust as it relates to trading partners complying with regulations (e.g., forced labor, environmental, global trade, etc.). If a trusted supply chain partner was found to have compliance or risk management issues, how would your organization most likely respond? What type of evidence do you require from trading partners for them to receive/retain “Trusted Partner” status?
Latest Talking Logistics Episode:
AI, Networks, And The Road To Supply Chain Breakthroughs
Platinum Sponsors
New from Sponsor Blogs
Trimble introduces AI-powered innovations at 2025 Trimble Insight Tech Conference
Source: Trimble
AI-powered next-gen Trimble TMS debuts at 2025 Trimble Insight Tech Conference
Source: Trimble
3 trends driving speed, agility, and accuracy in CPG retail logistics
Source: Uber Freight
Source: Uber Freight
Webinar: Rethinking Risk in Aerospace & Defense: From Checklist to Strategy
Source: Descartes
Web Seminar: Rethinking Risk in Aerospace & Defense: From Checklist to Strategy
Source: Descartes
Gold Sponsors
Most of this sounds sensible.
That’s usually the danger.
“Resilience”, “adaptability”, “connected execution” all look great at headline level. The real test is whether any of this survives first contact with incentives, budgets, and tired teams.
Reconfiguring “on the fly” is easy to say.
Harder when contracts, labour, and physical assets don’t move at the speed of strategy decks.
AI being “finally practical” is probably the most honest line here — not as a saviour, but as a force multiplier for people who already understand their system. Everywhere else, it mostly accelerates bad assumptions.
I write a lot about this gap between design intent and operational reality — the point where smart ideas start quietly shedding their promises. If that lens is useful, it’s here:
https://therantingforwarder.substack.com
The thinking is right. The execution bill is the part worth watching.